California State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, whose brand new online poker bill is far more inclusive than previous drafts, would welcome racetracks and PokerStars into the Golden State gaming market also.
A new California on line poker bill, sponsored by State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), happens to be on the table to oppose the bill introduced by fellow State Assemblyman Mike Gatto in December.
The Sawyer-Jones bill, AB 167, seeks to determine ‘a proper structure that is regulatory place that provides safe and compliant internet poker access,’ the assemblyman announced yesterday.
So how do the two brand new bills compare? And much more to the level, how can the Jones-Sawyer that is new bill with his previous bill, AB2291, which foundered on the rocks of last year’s legislative session?
No actors that are bad
Jones-Sawyer said at the conclusion of the 2014 session that a new, revised bill could be a high concern for 2015, and indicated that this time, the ‘bad actor’ language would be softened. The non-severable bad actor clauses of AB229 shown to become a sticking point for stakeholders, and caused a major schism between those who wanted PokerStars in the market and those who didn’t.
As expected, AB 167 seems to own removed those actor that is bad, apparently clearing the means for PokerStars to enter a regulated Ca market. Those precluded from applying for a on-line poker license, states the bill, include:
‘The person [who] has contemptuously defied an investigative that is legislative, or other formal investigative body of a state or of the usa or a foreign jurisdiction, when that body is engaged within the investigation of crimes relating to poker, official corruption associated to poker activities, or unlawful profiteering activity or organized crime, as defined in part l 86.2 of this Penal Code.’
The bill continues on to clarify a position that is key could straight affect PokerStars possible entry into the Golden State market, given its previously vilified owners vs. its new, ‘clean slate’ ones.
‘ The person [who] has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of a felony consisting of either having accepted a bet over the Internet in violation of United States or California law, or having abetted or aided that unlawful task.’
Note the employment of the word ‘person,’ which suggests that PokerStars, by divesting itself of its previous owners, against whom there were outstanding DOJ indictments, would have the ability to participate in the California on line market unscathed.
Anti-PokerStars Coalition Denounces Language
The language is in sharp contrast with that of final 12 months’s bill from Jones-Sawyer, which proposed to exclude ‘any brand name or business title, including any brand that is derivative with the exact same or similar wording, or any trade or solution mark, software, technology, functional system, customer information, or other data acquired, derived, or developed directly or indirectly from any operation that has accepted a wager or engaged in a financial deal pertaining to such bet from any person in the usa on any form of Internet video gaming after December 31, 2006.’
If Jones-Sawyer believes his bill will sail through because of the backing of the stakeholders, however, he has another think coming, as the anti-PokerStars tribal coalition wasted no time in denouncing this language.
‘There is a lot for tribes to dislike concerning this bill,’ said Pechanga Chairman Mark Macarro. ‘we have been disappointed that the bill disregards important principles from the broad coalition of respected tribes and card rooms that help avoid corporations and entities that previously violated federal law from profiting from tainted software, brands, and databases derived from illegal activity.’
Photo Finish for Racetracks and Liquidity
Other news that is major AB 167 could be the inclusion of California racetracks in a post-regulation landscape, which many felt had been unjustly ignored by past bills. The sharing of liquidity along with other states, expressly forbidden in preceding draft bills, appears to be on the menu this time, and there’s additionally a suggestion that players on unlicensed sites could be prosecuted.
The license fee would cost $10 million, by having a set that is tax-rate 8.5 percent of gross gaming revenue. Once language has been agreed upon, the bill will require two-thirds regarding the vote to pass.
New Bill Would Decriminalize Fantasy Sports in Washington
State Senator Pam Roach introduced a bill that would legalize sports that are fantasy in the state of Washington. (Image: PamRoach.com)
The state of Washington is known for having some of the harshest online gambling laws in the United States.
However these laws go even more than numerous realize: Washington additionally considers sports that are fantasy be considered a form of gambling, and therefore players who purchase their online fantasy sports leagues are technically breaking the law, and could even be charged with a felony underneath the same laws that criminalize online poker and casino games.
That’s a thing that numerous local officials would like to be changed.
With an estimated 500,000 residents in the state fantasy that is playing games, State Senator Pam Roach (R-31st District) says it’s time to reclassify the contests as a game of skill rather than as luck-based gambling.
‘Our state sees dream football being a game of chance a felony crime,’ Roach said. ‘Congress has long considered dream football to be a casino game of ability. My bill shall replace the state’s definition.’
Washington Residents Restricted from Fantasy Sports Sites
Now, many major online fantasy sports outlets block Washington residents from participating on their sites, including top daily fantasy sites like FanDuel and DraftKings.
Traditional season leagues that are long web sites like ESPN.com are frequently available to Washington residents, however they are typically ineligible to win rewards.
The situation is the fact that many states see fantasy activities as a game title of skill.
Nevertheless the Washington State Gambling Commission still views luck being a big enough factor to classify it as gambling under present state laws.
‘There’s constantly the opportunity the Seattle Seahawks will come back from two touchdowns down with two minutes left,’ said commission chairman Chris Stearns, talking about the Seahawks’ improbable comeback within the NFC Championship game weekend that is last. ‘Whereas in many states, the undeniable fact that you have invested all of this time poring over stats and making your very own spreadsheets, that’s the skill part, and that weighs most greatly.’
Sports Betting Would Remain Prohibited
Beneath the proposed law, there would nevertheless be a prohibition on placing bets on the outcome of real world events that are sporting.
Nonetheless, both daily and season-long fantasy recreations would be expressly appropriate, even for real cash play.
The bill seems to have better chances than a bill that is similar would decriminalize and regulate online poker; the dream recreations bill has bi-partisan support and has now acquired a number of sponsors on both edges of the aisle.
Companion bills have already been introduced in both the House of Representatives and hawaii Senate.
The legalization work is supported by the Fantasy Sports Trade Association, an industry group based away from Chicago.
According to your combined group, more than 41 million people in America and Canada play fantasy sports, and nearly half of them play for real money.
‘We think citizens of Washington should be in a position to have fun with the array that is full of sports contests offered in 45 other states and start to become able to win prizes in free contests offered by major media businesses,’ stated relationship chairman Peter Schoenke in a statement.
Washington is certainly one of five states in which residents are typically blocked from playing on daily fantasy sports sites.
As we recently reported, momentum is increasing in several of these states to legalize such games: recently, a Montana lawmaker introduced a bill that would allow residents to be involved in contests where the entry fee was $100 or less.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Rejects Kenosha Casino Project
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has rejected a casino that is proposed Kenosha, with some saying the move may be regarding his presidential aspirations. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has put the kibosh on a proposed casino plan, saying that building the venue would be too costly simply to taxpayers to be allowed.
In a statement, Walker stated that the state has been liable for up to $100 million towards the Potawatomi tribe, which has a casino in Milwaukee, because of agreements between your tribe and hawaii.
Under the compact that governs the contract between Wisconsin and also the Potawatomi tribe, hawaii is in charge of reimbursing the tribe for any revenue lost with other casinos that open in the state.
‘After a comprehensive review of the prospective economic impact of the proposed Kenosha casino project, the danger to hawaii’s taxpayers is too great,’ Walker said in a statement. ‘Due to the compacts negotiated by Governor Doyle, the current price to taxpayers of approving the proposed casino task is as much as $100 million and also the long-term economic hit to the state budget would be a potential loss of vast sums of bucks.’
The new casino, which would have price about $800 million to build, was to be considered a joint venture between the Menominee Tribe and tough Rock, which may have been accountable for operating the casino. The task was approved in 2013 by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, however it still required approval from the governor of Wisconsin before it could go forward.
Casino Supporters See Politics Behind Decision
While Walker stated the rejection was a solution to protect residents of hawaii from a financial obligation, the Menominee Tribe saw other motivations behind his decision.
‘One tribe, the Forest County Potawatomi and one goal of Governor Walker, the presidency, has led to a ‘no’ for our people,’ the tribe said in a statement.
Many governmental observers believe that Walker could be arranging a run at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016. The Menominee statement suggested that Walker’s decision was made to placate conservatives that are opposed to casino gambling. One prominent Iowa conservative, Tom Coates, recently penned a letter to Walker urging him to reject the casino. That letter was additionally finalized by 600 caucus that is potential from Iowa.
Whatever the motivation behind Walker’s decision, many locals in Kenosha were disappointed in the decision.
‘ There were people ready to down go to work here, and that’s not gonna take place now,’ Kenosha Mayor Keith Bosman told WTMJ.
With Kenosha Out of the real Way, Beloit Hopes for Federal Attention
It is feasible that Kenosha’s loss could be Beloit’s gain. Supporters of a Ho-Chunk Nation casino into the city hope that the rejection of the Menominee casino could mean that their project will pass through federal now review more quickly.
The city and the tribe have had a deal that is preliminary place since 2012 casino-online-australia.net, but officials say these people were told that the Bureau of Indian Affairs were delaying a choice in part because of the Kenosha proposal. The Ho-Chunk were publicly opposed to the Kenosha project.
Inspite of the rejection, nevertheless, the Menominee say they shall soldier on.
‘We must remember most of the Menominee country has overcome in more than 10,000 years,’ the tribe said in a declaration. ‘ We will continue steadily to flourish as a country and will still be partners that are honorable Indian Tribes in Wisconsin and around the Nation.’